Rumours are that the stay of the gorgeous Aishwarya Rai Bachchan with her husband Abhishek Bachchan throughout the shooting for the last schedule of Drona at Bikaner has more to it than meets the eye.

Buzz is Ash’s presence was more like she was there to guard her husband. She always reached the sets along with Abhishek, stayed there and left with him.

The reason for that allege gossipmongers is Ash does not appear to be too fond of Priyanka Chopra , who stars opposite Abhishek in ‘Drona’ and probability is that it flows from the fact that the two were linked during the making of Bluffmaster as the two had reportedly become very cozy.

Priyanka

Rumours continue that while at the sets, Ash tends to completely ignore Priyanka even while she exchanges pleasantries with the rest of the crew and apparently, Abhishek too tries keeping a guard when his wife is around.

This is not the first time that Ash has behaved strange with Abhishek’s heroines.

Rumour has it that she passed some not-so-favourable comments on her friend-turned-foe Rani Mukherjee during the shoots of Laaga Chunari Mein Daag .

It may be noted that Rani too was linked with Abhishek quite a few times and was also considered a frontrunner for the post of Mrs. Bachchan Jr before Ash won it hands down.

So is Ash possessive about Abhishek or plain insecure?

So watch this space for more updates on bollywood gossips and fun.. and don’t forget to post your comments..

Rani Mukherji

Bollywood actress Rani Mukherjee would soon be moving Bombay High Court against Ahmednagar District collectorate’s order to cancel her ownership of a plot near Shirdi due to irregularities in the deal.

’’After the final hearing earlier this month, the Sub-divisional Officer (SDO), Srirampur had passed an order to cancel the name of Rani Mukherjee from the land’s sale deed and took over its possession. We will move High Court against the order,’’ Mukherjee’s lawyer Nanasaheb Chaudhry said from Shirdi.

The actress is said to have paid Rs 33 lakh in December 2005 for a non-transferable farmland near Shirdi. After the purchase, Rani had paid a stamp duty of Rs 1.32 lakh for registration.

But the title of the land could not be transferred to her name as it belonged to a farmer. ’’We disagree with the findings of district administration. It has said that it was an agricultural land
hence it was ceiling it and required special permission from the government for transferring it to a non-farmer,’’ Mukherjee’s lawyer said.

’’The land, however, was already a non-agriculture land hence ceiling was not applicable under Section 47 of Ceiling Act,’’ he further said, adding, ’’the issue of the said land being ’non-agricultural land’ was not challenged after the Tehsildar had declared it so in 1981.’’

Rani bought the land 10 years ago but the district administration is refusing to transfer it on her name, he said.